This is extra a rant than the rest, and a bit faraway from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for ladies. Yes I'd love to start out a clothing company of my own which might also have it’s own “social mission” so to talk. Clothes companies targets are being profitable by concentrating on ladies. In the method the vast majority of clothes corporations make the world worse for ladies. It's as whether it is an agenda against girls. In all probability most women’s styles are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing collectively of the apparel item. The few ladies who are in the women’s clothing design industry apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a trend toward better clothes designs for women who need practicality, dignity and function in their clothes. And that is the place the dilemma comes in for a number of girls who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Ladies who simply need purposeful, comfy clothes are truly underrepresented . Certain, lots of people would say “Not so. Since a whole lot of low-rise or pores and skin-tight denims, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-brief skirts are the form of clothes that probably the majority of ladies purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means those are the styles that can proceed to be manufactured and moreover these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all types of women’s clothes, even those which can be supposed to be for perform not vogue. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches etc. It isn't the only clothing company that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates fashion into function. It brings us back to the place we began. As fairly a few women who posted right here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothes for higher fit, better comfort, higher freedom of movement and better durability. I would say that in general unisex sizing is the most effective technique to go together with some options that may help accommodate individuals who might need a bit extra hip or stomach (both men and women). Nearly all of women’s “active wear” sports bra and shorts simply don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are larger even in the case of “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is not possible. On the whole, women can match into men’s clothing this way. The scrubs had been supplied by the power. I not too long ago was working in a research facility and was required to wear scrubs. I instructed her that in relation to scrubs, a dimension small pant doesn't fit me and it is strange as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants fit me. The availability particular person mentioned she thought a dimension small would match me. The availability particular person mentioned that it's as a result of girls have hips and males don’t. I advised her that evidently a whole lot of small-sized men would discover it exhausting to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What lots of people seem to forget is that some males do have pretty-prominent hips and the vast majority of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. In reality when males get older, in their 40s they fairly often develop larger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio commercial for a special form of Levis jeans which had been meant for older men and it was stated that the features had more room in the hip and thigh. Yet men have a greater deal when it comes to clothes. Women’s clothing is at all times made to include trend somewhat than perform. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Publish, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and numerous other such shops, or online shops have a few of the higher types of clothes meant for hiking and different outdoor activities. Brands resembling Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and numerous others. These brands are likely to have the very best supplies, and the very best features. They've the very best mix of fabrics so as to be lightweight as potential for scorching days and which can protect in chilly days without a variety of bulk. They tend to have SPF inbuilt to protect the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a big dimension to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to wear and simply had a really awkward look to it. But, I have seen such absurdly-cut jackets for women by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to enhance the female form while being “useful” for outdoor exercise, or that's what the designers had in mind and yet I need to wonder what they were thinking by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and proscribing when i moved. I don’t know the way it ever acquired manufactured and possibly thousands have been made and it seemed to be a waste of time and supplies and it appeared as if the “quality control people” missed some main design flaws. I wish I wrote down the fashion number in order that perhaps I might find a hyperlink to it in the web and perhaps you all can see for yourself. There are other women’s lively wear that might not be as excessive but which still have sufficient lack of function so that almost all lively women just can not use them. The Hole and Previous Navy are not particularly for energetic put on however they have small line of such clothing. I think that they're awful in material and design. The Hole, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Target, Okay-Mart and different such shops, basically only have clothes made of cotton ( with a number of exceptions). Modell’s is imagined to be a “sports store” but it surely carries exercise clothing for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so forth) and although these are nicely-known model names, I discover that they actually put too much trend into clothing at the expense of perform. They went out of business years in the past however they also had clothing for girls that I found to be impractically designed. In New York City the place I reside there's one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-properly-known retailer in lower Manhattan which sells all sorts of outdoor/camping/hiking tools and clothes. There used to be a store in NYC referred to as Herman’s and one other known as Robbin’s. Far from it. I've seen girls in these stores speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they've appeared in all places for more practical designs . There is a company that loads of you in all probability have heard of referred to as “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively wear. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports activities Authority, and some Previous Navy’s and It would appear that there are quite a lot of shops that might have something for each girl. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The vast majority of their kinds are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” while enjoying sports or participating in rugged out of doors activities. Why do I all the time discover that the clothes that come the closest to being functional and rugged and practical are the ones that are discontinued and replaced by those that aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are really ineffective. They are meant for ladies who have perfect figures , even who are skilled models and the bathing suits are sexist in my view. They could continue a certain model for a number of seasons or they might substitute the model and by no means revive it. Why ought to any bathing swimsuit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had sure sorts of designs known as “Grab and Go” which means that the clothes are so virtually designed you could simply seize them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to train or do anything. Are you going to go swimming or surfing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as advertised to be. All through my life I have gone from store to store throughout sure instances of the 12 months on the lookout for the very best rugged and practical clothes for winter or summer season. It is all the time arduous to search out anything near what I need. It often goes for footwear and slippers and different footwear too. I usually must take no matter comes closest and that's often within the men’s section. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they were made the way they were.. I as soon as found some comfy slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd thing was that the soles have been designed with pretty-deep grooves that had been very carefully spaced and so they had been all over the only . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the main piece of clothing that will likely be touching the bottom and going by all kinds of disgusting stuff. I've had a fantasy of designing footwear which might be meant to be cleaned and are simple to wash. I can’t for the life of me understand why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it doesn't work on any type of foot wear like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes producer noticed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so forth) get caught within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires means that loads of the debris might be hurled off. No human can create that type of bodily force to continually pressure the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The best way that the grooves are designed it only makes the soles hard to scrub. It signifies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots can be filled up with debris and wouldn't assist a lot in helping the wearer to successfully climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to allow the wearer to climb. It appears to me that if the soles are fabricated from rubber there isn’t a necessity for such elaborately designed grooves that solely acquire dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians engaged on a better kind of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it could make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of sneakers. I have seen some unusual designs that don't contribute to function. It appears to me that grooves are just placed on the soles of sneakers for fashion functions. This goes for sneakers too. Loads of sneakers which could be good in design in other methods, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such kinds of pants, there are these which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are these with drawstrings. In fact I'm not an professional in making footwear or shoe-soles and that i could be flawed , however I'm enough of an skilled in carrying footwear meant for lively lifestyles and I feel that plenty of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the fallacious factor. I wonder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it unnecessary . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made in order that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist space. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I think it makes the drawstring much less efficient and it defeats the aim of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in stores similar to Okay-Mart and Goal where there are a large number of women’s underwear. It is hard to search out the kind of briefs that almost all of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my view. I desire comfort, durability and straightforward-care. All that does not communicate for me. Something that will get caught you-know-where is unacceptable. I've been in the underwear section of department stores and different stores (I need to admit I never regarded in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t count on to find something practical there), and I've seen older ladies looking for something that is age-acceptable and dignified and , once more, sensible. There's little aside from those hi-cuts. See one of many links under for an article about the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” are not modest sufficient. It appears it has always been about physically limiting women. That’s the way in which I have a look at it. Additionally one of many hyperlinks under result in an article about how there will probably be a women’s like of clothing which might be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It means that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have discovered to what I desire is a sure Jockey brand brief “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better form of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone extra simply . I need to order a size bigger than I usually would in order that the waist would not be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t understand the actual goal of “athletic bras” the way in which they're designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I truly don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for lively lifestyles should hold them in, nothing extra. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some feminine runners who appear to be high heavy and nonetheless they're very fast however I ponder if they will develop again issues later in life. I do know that I will not be addressing the needs of women born with sure sizes, or who have particular needs similar to after surgery, however sport bras needs to be made to have sufficient comfy tension to forestall bouncing. There is a need for bras that do what some jock straps are alleged to do. I would like to design shirts and vests with tension built into the correct area that will make bras pointless. It can be great for hotter weather and for simplicity, so you don’t have to trouble with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Just keep “them” from shifting. Just slip into your shirt (and other clothes ) and you'll exit to stroll , jog or no matter. Why isn’t there such a factor? I believe I discussed in one in all my earlier posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for girls called Solar Pant. I'm sure a variety of women would want such varieties of clothing. I then installed an elastic band to provide extra tension because the waist band could be a bit too large in any other case, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved reducing into the back of the waistband space because the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is extremely sensible for lots of activities. It isn't so lengthy that the hem drags on the flooring. It is not for very extremely popular weather but that may depend on your own capability to tolerate scorching weather. It's of a fabric mix that's not like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, however typically the way in which the pockets are designed make them ineffective anyway. I discover it is a very particular person thing. That is how most hiking pants must be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for highly regarded weather very much like the unique Coolibar Solar Pant. It is meant for use with a belt but I discover that I don’t want one to put on this pant. I discovered a pant on Cabela’s that's for men, but which suits effectively and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of the final two hyperlinks under). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight while you bend or transfer. In fact not everybody has the identical figure as I accomplish that others might need a unique opinion. However typically this is a good kind of pant . Should you do prefer it you should write to the company and tell them to cling on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so as the openings are slits almost fully parallel with the waist. I believe they'll discontinue it so you might want to provide it a attempt. The fabric stretches so it's not as unhealthy as if it have been with jeans with these kinds of pockets. It is an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothes designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets you have to maneuver your hands in a extra unnatural method and even raise the hem of your shirt to place your hands in your entrance pants pockets. It has to be for type, nothing else. Pockets must be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is good too. It's a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike whereas passing by too close will know what I mean. But generally zippers could cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you place your hands in. There's a must design zippers of non-scraping material for this function. There can also be another men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I discussed them before (see one of the 2 hyperlinks below). Why aren’t any clothing designers engaged on this? They're of a superb material for sizzling days, but for me, I discovered myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band in the back of the waistband area in order to make the belt pointless. I experience a bike. I hardly ever use shorts even after i jog. But once more, I have to settle for no matter comes close to what I want. I got here throughout a working short referred to as Brooks Sherpa IV. I tend to only go to clothing shops to have a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I simply puzzled why common long pants usually are not made from such a cloth. It can be glorious for a hiking pant meant for very hot weather. The material was very very similar to a very very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face called The Prolix jacket. I really like softshell clothes. It is extremely lightweight, not very good for cold weather by itself but you possibly can put layering underneath it. It is versatile and suits excellently and permits freedom of movement. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer time. Also , why aren’t there any actually actually virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make a terrific summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I find myself wishing for such a thing. It doesn't exist. Why not make one in all lightweight and stretchy material? I do know that I have stated to much on this submit. I'll stop for now. I hope I didn't bore anybody. I have a variety of ideas for the better design of clothing and I'll most likely publish once more with my ideas unless
